Why did india adopted for parliamentary executive​

India adopted the Parliamentary form of democracy after getting Independence in 1947 because India had been familiar with its working during the days of the British rule. ... Moreover, while in a parliamentary democracy, the Executive is responsible to the legislature and therefore, the opposition always keeps it alert.

Regards,

The correct answer is option D) Executive that is dependent on support of the majority in the parliament

The parliamentary executive is is group of members that decide what is better for the people of the country and accordingly execute the laws where as presidential executive is a group of people who who does not think what people need and even does not think what are the positive and the negative effects of the law but just execute them .

☺✌☺◦•●◉✿ ɪⁿ ᶜᵒᵘⁿᵗʳⁱᵉˢ ʷʰᵉʳᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ˡᵉᵃᵈᵉʳˢʰⁱᵖ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵍᵒᵛᵉʳⁿᵐᵉⁿᵗ ⁱˢ ᶜᵒᵐᵖʳⁱˢᵉᵈ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ʳᵘˡⁱⁿᵍ ᵖᵃʳᵗʸ ᵒʳ ᶜᵒᵃˡⁱᵗⁱᵒⁿ ⁱⁿ ᵖᵃʳˡⁱᵃᵐᵉⁿᵗ, ᵗʰᵉ ᵖᵃʳˡⁱᵃᵐᵉⁿᵗᵃʳʸ ᵉˣᵉᶜᵘᵗⁱᵛᵉ ᵃʳᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ˡᵉᵃᵈᵉʳˢ ˢᵉˡᵉᶜᵗᵉᵈ ᶠʳᵒᵐ ᵗʰᵉ ʳᵘˡⁱⁿᵍ ᵖᵃʳᵗʸ ᵒʳ ᶜᵒᵃˡⁱᵗⁱᵒⁿ ᵗᵒ ˡᵉᵃᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵇᵘʳᵉᵃᵘᶜʳᵃᶜʸ ᵃⁿᵈ ᶜʳᵉᵃᵗᵉ ᵖᵒˡⁱᶜʸ ᶠᵒʳ ᵗʰᵉ ᵍᵒᵛᵉʳⁿᵐᵉⁿᵗ. ᴛʰᵉʳᵉ ⁱˢ ⁿᵒᵗ ⁿᵉᶜᵉˢˢᵃʳⁱˡʸ ᵃ ˢᵉᵖᵃʳᵃᵗᵉ, ᵉˣᵉᶜᵘᵗⁱᵛᵉ ᵇʳᵃⁿᶜʰ. ✿◉●•◦☺✌☺

Aur Ek baar brainliest mark kar de na re bhai...... Kripaya hogi..... Pranaam... Mawaali.. ☺✌

A coalition government is a form of government in which political parties cooperate, reducing the dominance of any one party within that "coalition". The usual reason for this arrangement is that no party on its own can achieve a majority in the election. A coalition government might also be created in a time of national difficulty or crisis (for example, during wartime or economic crisis) to give a government the high degree of perceived political legitimacy or collective identity, it can also play a role in diminishing internal political strife. In such times, parties have formed all-party coalitions (national unity governments, grand coalitions). If a coalition collapses, a confidence vote is held or a motion of no confidence is taken.

A parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislative branch, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament.

A parliamentary system or parliamentary democracy is a system of democratic governance of a state (or subordinate entity) where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. In a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. This is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

ANSWER :  

A parliamentary executive means:EXECUTIVE THAT IS DEPENDENT ON SUPPORT OF THE MAJORITY IN THE PARLIAMENT.

** Executive is that organ of the government which enforces the will of the Legislature expressed in the form of laws.

HOPE THIS ANSWER WILL HELP YOU…

answer:

(Such as Thailand, the United Kingdom,

Denmark, Sweden and Japan).

These countries have a parliamentary excutive.

Explanation:

I hope it is helpful to you.

answer:

Countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as Thailand, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, and Japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president

answer:

during foreign invasion

explanation:

given

length of train = 500 metre

speed of train = 15 metre per second in east direction

speed of bird = 10 metre per second in west direction

according to problem

=> vr = vt + vb

=> vr = 10 + 15

=> vr = 25 metre per second

now we know that

speed = distance \ time

so time = distance \ speed

=> time = 500 \ 25

=> time = 20 seconds